- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Reactions to the March 2016 Istanbul bombing
- Reactions to the March 2016 Istanbul bombing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly a QUOTEFARM which should be selectively merge on the main article. Fails WP:GNG. See, concurrent discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing (2nd nomination). Greenbörg (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Very selective merge to main is also possible. No need to list all ROUTINE sympathy reactions. Icewhiz ( talk) 18:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - per Icewhiz's !vote above. Inter&anthro ( talk) 00:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I was going to get around to this article sooner or later; I'm glad someone else did anyways. I will echo the rationale I've chosen from similar articles I've nominated: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and WP:GNG cannot be applied to individual quotes of sympathy that weren't considered essential to the actual article. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 01:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Reactions to the March 2016 Istanbul bombing
- Reactions to the March 2016 Istanbul bombing ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly a QUOTEFARM which should be selectively merge on the main article. Fails WP:GNG. See, concurrent discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Lahore suicide bombing (2nd nomination). Greenbörg (talk) 15:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Very selective merge to main is also possible. No need to list all ROUTINE sympathy reactions. Icewhiz ( talk) 18:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - per Icewhiz's !vote above. Inter&anthro ( talk) 00:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I was going to get around to this article sooner or later; I'm glad someone else did anyways. I will echo the rationale I've chosen from similar articles I've nominated: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and WP:GNG cannot be applied to individual quotes of sympathy that weren't considered essential to the actual article. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 01:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.