The result was keep, I'm being bold and closing this for now, since the nominator didn't provide a delete rationale, and nobody else has come forward with one. No prejudice against re-nomination at a later time. Umbralcorax ( talk) 16:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep: As deletion requests normally come with an explanation, this deletion request is incomplete as only a tag was placed without a rationale for deletion. Please follow the steps at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Without giving a reason for deletion, there is really no logic to delete this article which complies with WP policies. It offers an important perspective to the history of the film and should be kept. Without this perspective, the main article, Slumdog Millionaire will violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. - Classicfilms ( talk) 05:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, I'm being bold and closing this for now, since the nominator didn't provide a delete rationale, and nobody else has come forward with one. No prejudice against re-nomination at a later time. Umbralcorax ( talk) 16:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep: As deletion requests normally come with an explanation, this deletion request is incomplete as only a tag was placed without a rationale for deletion. Please follow the steps at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Without giving a reason for deletion, there is really no logic to delete this article which complies with WP policies. It offers an important perspective to the history of the film and should be kept. Without this perspective, the main article, Slumdog Millionaire will violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. - Classicfilms ( talk) 05:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC) reply