- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 10:28, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ravinder Saini ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources, therefore fails Wikipedia general notability guideline and Wikipedia notability guideline for biography of living person. All sources listed in the article, are written BY the subject. There's nothing ABOUT the subject. Subject does not even appears to be meeting WP:ANYBIO standard. So, the article on subject qualifies for deletion for failing notability. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 22:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 22:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly-written POV article (A statement such as "[h]e raises the voice of unemployed qualified youth" does not seem encyclopedic at all) and no evidence of meeting WP:BIO. Claims of notability without support. -- Kinu t/ c 22:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:N and WP:V. CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 15:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG, per nomination. Fai zan 17:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Keepthis page as it is very notable topic based on references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.122.133 ( talk) 09:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Strike as per WP:DISCUSSAFD and possibly WP:COI. CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 14:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete cannot find WP:RS, third party sources, hence fails WP:GNG. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 20:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy eligible for WP:PRESERVE, Journalist is notable in his area and may be improved with rich sources. Rajsaharanwasw ( talk) 08:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 10:28, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ravinder Saini ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources, therefore fails Wikipedia general notability guideline and Wikipedia notability guideline for biography of living person. All sources listed in the article, are written BY the subject. There's nothing ABOUT the subject. Subject does not even appears to be meeting WP:ANYBIO standard. So, the article on subject qualifies for deletion for failing notability. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 22:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 22:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly-written POV article (A statement such as "[h]e raises the voice of unemployed qualified youth" does not seem encyclopedic at all) and no evidence of meeting WP:BIO. Claims of notability without support. -- Kinu t/ c 22:24, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:N and WP:V. CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 15:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG, per nomination. Fai zan 17:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Keepthis page as it is very notable topic based on references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.122.133 ( talk) 09:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Strike as per WP:DISCUSSAFD and possibly WP:COI. CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 14:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete cannot find WP:RS, third party sources, hence fails WP:GNG. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 20:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy eligible for WP:PRESERVE, Journalist is notable in his area and may be improved with rich sources. Rajsaharanwasw ( talk) 08:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.