The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a film producer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:CREATIVE. The attempted notability claim is a long, long list of awards and nominations, which aren't properly referenced for the purposes of establishing whether they're notability-making awards or not -- that test does not just indiscriminately accept every single film or television award that exists, but looks specifically for top-level awards (Oscar, BAFTA, César, top film festivals on the Cannes-Berlin-TIFF-Sundance tip, etc.) that can be established as significant by referencing the awards to media coverage that treats the awards as news.
But this is referenced entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as the subject's own
self-published website about himself, directory entries, streaming copies of his films on Vimeo, Instagram posts and the self-published websites of non-media organizations directly affiliated with the claims, with not even one reliable or
WP:GNG-worthy source shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a film producer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:CREATIVE. The attempted notability claim is a long, long list of awards and nominations, which aren't properly referenced for the purposes of establishing whether they're notability-making awards or not -- that test does not just indiscriminately accept every single film or television award that exists, but looks specifically for top-level awards (Oscar, BAFTA, César, top film festivals on the Cannes-Berlin-TIFF-Sundance tip, etc.) that can be established as significant by referencing the awards to media coverage that treats the awards as news.
But this is referenced entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as the subject's own
self-published website about himself, directory entries, streaming copies of his films on Vimeo, Instagram posts and the self-published websites of non-media organizations directly affiliated with the claims, with not even one reliable or
WP:GNG-worthy source shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)