- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject initially met the criteria for WP:POLITICIAN after winning a national parliament seat in the recent election and taking oath as a member of parliament. However, due to a recount the following month, their opponent was declared the winner, resulting in the subject losing their parliamentary seat. which means the subject met WP:POLITICIAN but for brief time. further, the subject fails to meet the basic WP:GNG criteria. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep I'm not sure what the policy is for situations like this, but it would seem like they'd still be considered notable. Worth pointing out that there are other people who were elected and never seated but still got a Wikipedia page, such as Luke Letlow. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 21:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Make sense. I Withdraw this nomination. --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 21:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rana Muhammad Faraz Noon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject initially met the criteria for WP:POLITICIAN after winning a national parliament seat in the recent election and taking oath as a member of parliament. However, due to a recount the following month, their opponent was declared the winner, resulting in the subject losing their parliamentary seat. which means the subject met WP:POLITICIAN but for brief time. further, the subject fails to meet the basic WP:GNG criteria. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 15:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep I'm not sure what the policy is for situations like this, but it would seem like they'd still be considered notable. Worth pointing out that there are other people who were elected and never seated but still got a Wikipedia page, such as Luke Letlow. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 21:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Make sense. I Withdraw this nomination. --— Saqib ( talk | contribs) 21:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.