- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Ramal, California
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ramal, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created outside the run of geostub creation we've been dealing with, but the issues remain the same. Go back far enough and the topos show a rail junction here, but in no era is there any sign of a settlement. It's just a NN rail spot. Mangoe ( talk) 17:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No post office. newspapers.com indicates that Ramal was a station: [1], [2], so WP:STATION applies. Newspapers.com did have a few articles of the form "so and so visited from Ramal": [3], [4]. There are some railfan articles about the Wingo/Ramal branch, but nothing that indicates that there was much of anything there. GBooks had hits concerning the railroad, Ramal road and the Ramal region, but nothing indicating that there was a notable settlement. As there is no legal recognition and there is no non-trivial coverage, #1 and #2 of WP:GEOLAND are not met. Cxbrx ( talk) 21:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This article should have had WP:PROD applied, ""Proposed deletion (PROD) is a way to suggest an article or file for uncontroversial deletion. It is an easier method of removing articles or files than the articles for deletion (AfD) or files for discussion (FfD) processes, and is meant for uncomplicated deletion proposals that do not meet the strict criteria for speedy deletion. Jeepday ( talk) 11:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Ramal, California
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ramal, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created outside the run of geostub creation we've been dealing with, but the issues remain the same. Go back far enough and the topos show a rail junction here, but in no era is there any sign of a settlement. It's just a NN rail spot. Mangoe ( talk) 17:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No post office. newspapers.com indicates that Ramal was a station: [1], [2], so WP:STATION applies. Newspapers.com did have a few articles of the form "so and so visited from Ramal": [3], [4]. There are some railfan articles about the Wingo/Ramal branch, but nothing that indicates that there was much of anything there. GBooks had hits concerning the railroad, Ramal road and the Ramal region, but nothing indicating that there was a notable settlement. As there is no legal recognition and there is no non-trivial coverage, #1 and #2 of WP:GEOLAND are not met. Cxbrx ( talk) 21:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This article should have had WP:PROD applied, ""Proposed deletion (PROD) is a way to suggest an article or file for uncontroversial deletion. It is an easier method of removing articles or files than the articles for deletion (AfD) or files for discussion (FfD) processes, and is meant for uncomplicated deletion proposals that do not meet the strict criteria for speedy deletion. Jeepday ( talk) 11:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.