The result was no consensus. The article is reliably sourced, so no policy demands its removal. The argument that the availability of sources is limited by the subject's nationality is well-taken and difficult to rebut, given the interest of the encyclopedia in avoiding geographic bias. While the professor's notability is not clear for the discussion, consensus to delete does not exist, so keeping is the default outcome. Xoloz ( talk) 15:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete for lack of notability and lack of appropriate third party sources. A list of publications does not establish notability. A couple of reviews do not establish notability. Article has been created and maintained by single-purpose user. Doczilla ( talk) 06:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. The article is reliably sourced, so no policy demands its removal. The argument that the availability of sources is limited by the subject's nationality is well-taken and difficult to rebut, given the interest of the encyclopedia in avoiding geographic bias. While the professor's notability is not clear for the discussion, consensus to delete does not exist, so keeping is the default outcome. Xoloz ( talk) 15:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete for lack of notability and lack of appropriate third party sources. A list of publications does not establish notability. A couple of reviews do not establish notability. Article has been created and maintained by single-purpose user. Doczilla ( talk) 06:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply