- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch ( talk) 23:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Radicalisation Project ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination, as original title was also deleted by PROD. PROD concern was "For the same unchanged reasons Radicalization Watch Project was proposed for deletion and deleted. — Racconish Tk 12:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)" Courcelles 15:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Don't know if I am allowed to participate in the debate as I have less than a 100 contributions, I'm essentially a French wiki user -- Article should be deleted as the Radicalisation Project#References are too poor -- Xavxav ( talk) 10:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable university research project. -- Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch ( talk) 23:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Radicalisation Project ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination, as original title was also deleted by PROD. PROD concern was "For the same unchanged reasons Radicalization Watch Project was proposed for deletion and deleted. — Racconish Tk 12:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)" Courcelles 15:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 15:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Don't know if I am allowed to participate in the debate as I have less than a 100 contributions, I'm essentially a French wiki user -- Article should be deleted as the Radicalisation Project#References are too poor -- Xavxav ( talk) 10:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable university research project. -- Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.