- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Radiance Protection Factor
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Radiance Protection Factor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be a promotional article for a term devised by a single company. No evidence it is in sufficiently wide use to meet GNG at this time. PianoDan ( talk) 17:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not a notable subject and only exists to promote Eyesafe, yet again. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet notability guidelines, inherently promotional (see PRAXIDICAE's comment), and causes unnecessary confusion with Sun protection factor. Teb (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. Note also, that as a product, it should be in the company page anyway, instead of stand-alone, unless inclusion there makes the pag3 too large. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete lack of notability -- Morpho achilles ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Total of three hits, one is a PR Newswire, rest are in Chinese. Assuming non-reliable for the last two as well. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable proprietary/made up standard. Might catch on, might not. At best WP:TOOSOON applies. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 15:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Science. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Radiance Protection Factor
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Radiance Protection Factor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be a promotional article for a term devised by a single company. No evidence it is in sufficiently wide use to meet GNG at this time. PianoDan ( talk) 17:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not a notable subject and only exists to promote Eyesafe, yet again. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet notability guidelines, inherently promotional (see PRAXIDICAE's comment), and causes unnecessary confusion with Sun protection factor. Teb (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability. Note also, that as a product, it should be in the company page anyway, instead of stand-alone, unless inclusion there makes the pag3 too large. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete lack of notability -- Morpho achilles ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Total of three hits, one is a PR Newswire, rest are in Chinese. Assuming non-reliable for the last two as well. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable proprietary/made up standard. Might catch on, might not. At best WP:TOOSOON applies. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 15:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Science. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.