The result was no consensus, default to keep. This AfD has been up long enough, move along. It appears to be unique as a 501(c)(3) team. Bearian ( talk) 15:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply
I've listed this separatley from several other semi-pro football teams nominated for deletion because there is more content to the article. This one has the most information on the page. However, the same issues do persist: extraordinarily weak assertion of notability, no independent reliable sources, and a stronger case for violation of neutral point of view. Paul McDonald ( talk) 19:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, default to keep. This AfD has been up long enough, move along. It appears to be unique as a 501(c)(3) team. Bearian ( talk) 15:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply
I've listed this separatley from several other semi-pro football teams nominated for deletion because there is more content to the article. This one has the most information on the page. However, the same issues do persist: extraordinarily weak assertion of notability, no independent reliable sources, and a stronger case for violation of neutral point of view. Paul McDonald ( talk) 19:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC) reply