- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Rachel Gill ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Been tagged for over 4 years now. And am not find a lot about who this is. (Though to be fair Rachel Gill is a common name-yet can't find any people from there with that name) Wgolf ( talk) 02:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject does not establish notability in accordance with it has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Justice007 ( talk) 15:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete Given the lack of sources--except for a single dead link--in the article, or the lack of meaningful content in the article, there is no evidence Ms. Gill is notable.-- danntm T C 05:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete lack of hits show that while she may be a model and such, she's not all that remarkable. Unfortunate delete Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Rachel Gill ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Been tagged for over 4 years now. And am not find a lot about who this is. (Though to be fair Rachel Gill is a common name-yet can't find any people from there with that name) Wgolf ( talk) 02:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject does not establish notability in accordance with it has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Justice007 ( talk) 15:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Delete Given the lack of sources--except for a single dead link--in the article, or the lack of meaningful content in the article, there is no evidence Ms. Gill is notable.-- danntm T C 05:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete lack of hits show that while she may be a model and such, she's not all that remarkable. Unfortunate delete Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.