The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article was redirected to Anthropological criminology (the same exact topic, but adds modern theory and evaluation to Race and crime's anachronistic racist history) on August 31 [1] per discussion whose last two comments were on July 14 [2] and August 30 [3]. An editor who did not take part in this discussion has restored the page [4]. There is no need for both of these articles; Race and crime is a POV fork at which several editors (or socks?) have tried to reinstate a series of statistics [5] in violation of wp:PSTS ("Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them."), and which even those who want the stats in the article claim have proven unanalyzable by professionals [6]. Furthermore, Race and crime is an absolute wp:coatrack, at which racist history and unintelligible stats are covered rather than the huge and multifaceted sociological treatise one might expect with the title "Race and crime". NJGW ( talk) 08:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
keep This topic is cogent to sociology. Gooogen ( talk) 10:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 08:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Article was redirected to Anthropological criminology (the same exact topic, but adds modern theory and evaluation to Race and crime's anachronistic racist history) on August 31 [1] per discussion whose last two comments were on July 14 [2] and August 30 [3]. An editor who did not take part in this discussion has restored the page [4]. There is no need for both of these articles; Race and crime is a POV fork at which several editors (or socks?) have tried to reinstate a series of statistics [5] in violation of wp:PSTS ("Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them."), and which even those who want the stats in the article claim have proven unanalyzable by professionals [6]. Furthermore, Race and crime is an absolute wp:coatrack, at which racist history and unintelligible stats are covered rather than the huge and multifaceted sociological treatise one might expect with the title "Race and crime". NJGW ( talk) 08:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC) reply
keep This topic is cogent to sociology. Gooogen ( talk) 10:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC) reply