- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
ROTU World
- ROTU World ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any evidence of notability. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable entertainment company. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete no indications of notability no significant RS coverage to meet GNG. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, as noted there is nothing showing significant independent coverage; not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek ( talk) 03:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Ayub407 talk 07:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 05:23, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
ROTU World
- ROTU World ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any evidence of notability. Adam9007 ( talk) 01:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable entertainment company. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete no indications of notability no significant RS coverage to meet GNG. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, as noted there is nothing showing significant independent coverage; not notable for stand alone article. Kierzek ( talk) 03:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Ayub407 talk 07:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.