- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was : Deleted. Non-notable, single-purpose software; promotional (e.g. the first paragraph addresses the viewer instead of describing the software). - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 12:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
RHU Program
- RHU Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 16:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. A search revealed no additional significant coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 19:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Non-notable software, the article is purely promotional. -- Sander Säde 08:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was : Deleted. Non-notable, single-purpose software; promotional (e.g. the first paragraph addresses the viewer instead of describing the software). - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 12:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
RHU Program
- RHU Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 16:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. A search revealed no additional significant coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 19:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Non-notable software, the article is purely promotional. -- Sander Säde 08:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.