- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Deor ( talk) 22:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
RAKBANK
- RAKBANK ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page written more like an advertorial than informative using few credible and repetitive references. Drnazish ( talk) 10:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Extensive coverage in reliable sources. Tone can be fixed by editing. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Some advertorial toned sections have been removed, improvements can be made by further editing. Nnayak83 ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 05 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep but continue working on the tone... and check for possible copyvios. -- j⚛e decker talk 20:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely a Keep: this is well-known bank and a household name in the United Arab Emirates. It makes absolutely no sense to delete this article -- as others have stated here, improvements (such as fixing the tone) and further editing is what's necessary. Arjun G. Menon ( talk · mail) 18:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Deor ( talk) 22:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
RAKBANK
- RAKBANK ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page written more like an advertorial than informative using few credible and repetitive references. Drnazish ( talk) 10:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Extensive coverage in reliable sources. Tone can be fixed by editing. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 14:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 03:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Some advertorial toned sections have been removed, improvements can be made by further editing. Nnayak83 ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 05 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep but continue working on the tone... and check for possible copyvios. -- j⚛e decker talk 20:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely a Keep: this is well-known bank and a household name in the United Arab Emirates. It makes absolutely no sense to delete this article -- as others have stated here, improvements (such as fixing the tone) and further editing is what's necessary. Arjun G. Menon ( talk · mail) 18:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.