The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
this article was on AFD before, the decision to keep it was based on the fact that the subject starred in a movie that now has been deleted on wikipedia (not notable), blog sources and pornbio. Now that the movie has been recognized as not notable and porn bio has been deprecated, there is nothing in this bio to prove notability. I looked for other sources but couldn't find anything.
AlejandroLeloirRey (
talk)
11:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Nominating on behalf of AlejandroLeloirRey above, who tried to nominate using Page Curation but encountered the bug therein with second (and subsequent) AfD nominations. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --
Finngalltalk20:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. delete. The article's current sources are junk. However, a
WP:BEFORE re-check indicates some RS coverage under his newer HungerFF stage name, such as a few
Vice article and an interview-like profile in Out. Not there yet on WP:BASIC, but I'll hold back on a !vote for further searching.
• Gene93k (
talk)
18:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)reply
the Vice article is more than a mention but it is far away from a cover of the subject. in the whole article one paragraph is about him. the Out article is a chat with him about fisting. so, neither of them have any importance in deciding if the subject is notabile. --
AlejandroLeloirRey (
talk)
08:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Further searching yielded only press releases and minor porn award nominations. While the current non-zero RS coverage is an improvement over 2008, it still cannot establish notability per
WP:BASIC nor prove it per
WP:ENT.
• Gene93k (
talk)
01:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
this article was on AFD before, the decision to keep it was based on the fact that the subject starred in a movie that now has been deleted on wikipedia (not notable), blog sources and pornbio. Now that the movie has been recognized as not notable and porn bio has been deprecated, there is nothing in this bio to prove notability. I looked for other sources but couldn't find anything.
AlejandroLeloirRey (
talk)
11:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Nominating on behalf of AlejandroLeloirRey above, who tried to nominate using Page Curation but encountered the bug therein with second (and subsequent) AfD nominations. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --
Finngalltalk20:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. delete. The article's current sources are junk. However, a
WP:BEFORE re-check indicates some RS coverage under his newer HungerFF stage name, such as a few
Vice article and an interview-like profile in Out. Not there yet on WP:BASIC, but I'll hold back on a !vote for further searching.
• Gene93k (
talk)
18:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)reply
the Vice article is more than a mention but it is far away from a cover of the subject. in the whole article one paragraph is about him. the Out article is a chat with him about fisting. so, neither of them have any importance in deciding if the subject is notabile. --
AlejandroLeloirRey (
talk)
08:56, 1 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Further searching yielded only press releases and minor porn award nominations. While the current non-zero RS coverage is an improvement over 2008, it still cannot establish notability per
WP:BASIC nor prove it per
WP:ENT.
• Gene93k (
talk)
01:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.