- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Qupital
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Qupital ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An IP reverted my WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT, saying "content and reference are valid", which doesn't address that this is non-notable company not meeting WP:NCORP because sources are either: forbes contributor (unreliable); crunchbase and bloomberg profile (routine); or other routine coverage of funding with no real analysis Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The references do not amount to significant coverage. A depth of coverage ( WP:CORPDEPTH) is not established here. Slideshow Bob ( talk) 13:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Qupital
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Qupital ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An IP reverted my WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT, saying "content and reference are valid", which doesn't address that this is non-notable company not meeting WP:NCORP because sources are either: forbes contributor (unreliable); crunchbase and bloomberg profile (routine); or other routine coverage of funding with no real analysis Galobtter ( pingó mió) 09:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The references do not amount to significant coverage. A depth of coverage ( WP:CORPDEPTH) is not established here. Slideshow Bob ( talk) 13:47, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:55, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.