- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus reached after two weeks and a relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Qumbya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet notability requirements. Kelly hi! 11:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like a WP:ADVERT. WP:N not established.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete there are third party sources available, but I don't think they cross the threshold of WP:CORP: [1] is a very local newspaper focusing on business, [2] appears to be some kind of local alternative newspaper, [3] is a student newspaper, [4] is a local newspaper and doesn't give much coverage of the subject, etc. I don't see evidence that this organisation has received the kind of substantial coverage in at least regional media that WP:CORP asks for. Hut 8.5 21:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing meaningful to add to what User:Hut 8.5 has explained above. Mwenzangu ( talk) 07:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus reached after two weeks and a relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Qumbya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet notability requirements. Kelly hi! 11:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like a WP:ADVERT. WP:N not established.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete there are third party sources available, but I don't think they cross the threshold of WP:CORP: [1] is a very local newspaper focusing on business, [2] appears to be some kind of local alternative newspaper, [3] is a student newspaper, [4] is a local newspaper and doesn't give much coverage of the subject, etc. I don't see evidence that this organisation has received the kind of substantial coverage in at least regional media that WP:CORP asks for. Hut 8.5 21:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing meaningful to add to what User:Hut 8.5 has explained above. Mwenzangu ( talk) 07:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 21:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.