- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Pub quiz. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Quizzo
- Quizzo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
seems like just another pub quiz organisation or loose arrangement. not notable enough for a separate page - maybe worthy of a mention on pub quiz page but nothing more. no significant coverage, fails GNG Rayman60 ( talk) 17:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete + Redirect to Pub quiz. I don't see significant secondary coverage, just a few bars in the Eastern United States advertising this. There's no proof in the article/references that all the "Quizzo" groups are related. Redirect to discourage re-creation. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 22:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 22:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No independant references, just one blog reference. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 03:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete + Redirect to Pub quiz. I don't also don't see significant secondary coverage from reliable sources. The most impressive sounding source cited in the article was the "National Trivia Association". But when Googled the term "National Trivia Association", the search results were unimpressive. When you find search results like "Watch out for National Trivia Association, they $^%#$%$ me", it doesn't inspire confidence. In addition, there are 8 external links in the article and merely one source in the citation section for the article. And given the quality of the external links, this is definitely a red flag. Knox490 ( talk) 02:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Pub quiz. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Quizzo
- Quizzo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
seems like just another pub quiz organisation or loose arrangement. not notable enough for a separate page - maybe worthy of a mention on pub quiz page but nothing more. no significant coverage, fails GNG Rayman60 ( talk) 17:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete + Redirect to Pub quiz. I don't see significant secondary coverage, just a few bars in the Eastern United States advertising this. There's no proof in the article/references that all the "Quizzo" groups are related. Redirect to discourage re-creation. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 22:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) ( m) 22:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 23:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No independant references, just one blog reference. Deathlibrarian ( talk) 03:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete + Redirect to Pub quiz. I don't also don't see significant secondary coverage from reliable sources. The most impressive sounding source cited in the article was the "National Trivia Association". But when Googled the term "National Trivia Association", the search results were unimpressive. When you find search results like "Watch out for National Trivia Association, they $^%#$%$ me", it doesn't inspire confidence. In addition, there are 8 external links in the article and merely one source in the citation section for the article. And given the quality of the external links, this is definitely a red flag. Knox490 ( talk) 02:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.