- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor Talk! 01:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Quixey
- Quixey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely advertorial as all of this is either puffery, press releases or trivial coverage; nothing at all from it is actually convincing and my own searches are also mirroring this by not finding anything actually substantial. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Passes WP:CORPDEPTH per coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Also passes WP:AUD per national-level news coverage. The article would benefit from copy editing, because it reads as a press release in areas. North America 1000 08:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
References
- Lee, Ellen (April 13, 2012). "Tech startups use contests to identify talent". USA Today. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Butler, Steven (May 29, 2014). "App search engine Quixey wants to take on Google". USA Today. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Wohlsen, Marcus (April 21, 2015). "Quixey's Search Engine Is for Actions Not Words". Wired. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Fannin, Rebecca (January 29, 2015). "Guru Fixer Takes Quixey On Fast-Track Journey To China And India". Forbes. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Perez, Sarah (October 23, 2013). "Quixey's First Consumer-Facing App Offers A New Take On App Search & Discovery For Android Users". TechCrunch. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Bort, Julie (June 9, 2013). "This 29-Year-Old Nabbed $24 Million Because He Can See The Future". Business Insider. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Cheng, Roger (February 25, 2014). "Quixey's mobile search lets you dig deep into apps for results". CNET. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Strong Keep Needing cleanup or a rewrite is not a reason to delete when there is a large amount of reliable, independent source material with in-depth coverage of the subject. Clearly and obviously passes the general notability guideline. Steven Walling • talk 06:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor Talk! 01:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Quixey
- Quixey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Entirely advertorial as all of this is either puffery, press releases or trivial coverage; nothing at all from it is actually convincing and my own searches are also mirroring this by not finding anything actually substantial. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep – Passes WP:CORPDEPTH per coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Also passes WP:AUD per national-level news coverage. The article would benefit from copy editing, because it reads as a press release in areas. North America 1000 08:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
References
- Lee, Ellen (April 13, 2012). "Tech startups use contests to identify talent". USA Today. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Butler, Steven (May 29, 2014). "App search engine Quixey wants to take on Google". USA Today. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Wohlsen, Marcus (April 21, 2015). "Quixey's Search Engine Is for Actions Not Words". Wired. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Fannin, Rebecca (January 29, 2015). "Guru Fixer Takes Quixey On Fast-Track Journey To China And India". Forbes. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Perez, Sarah (October 23, 2013). "Quixey's First Consumer-Facing App Offers A New Take On App Search & Discovery For Android Users". TechCrunch. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Bort, Julie (June 9, 2013). "This 29-Year-Old Nabbed $24 Million Because He Can See The Future". Business Insider. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Cheng, Roger (February 25, 2014). "Quixey's mobile search lets you dig deep into apps for results". CNET. Retrieved August 1, 2016.
- Strong Keep Needing cleanup or a rewrite is not a reason to delete when there is a large amount of reliable, independent source material with in-depth coverage of the subject. Clearly and obviously passes the general notability guideline. Steven Walling • talk 06:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.