The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
No evidence of notability, no good sources, and probably
WP:NOTDICT. The best I could find when I went looking for sources or notability was
this English Stack Exchange answer, which references the Oxford English Dictionary and a brief mention in Lore and Language of School Children, but nothing more substantive. —
me_
and 14:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
See alsoWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dibs (2nd nomination), where a similar article has recently been deleted on
WP:NOTDICT grounds (and fixing up links to that deleted article is how I found this one). I think that discussion had more claim to NOTDICT than this one, but that still doesn't solve the lack of reliable sources or other indication of notability. —
me_
and 14:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Searched for the term and found next to nothing. Does it only exist in novelty dictionaries? --
Mr. Magoo and McBarker (
talk) 14:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 02:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - No signs of a better applicably notable article yet.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)reply
No evidence of notability, no good sources, and probably
WP:NOTDICT. The best I could find when I went looking for sources or notability was
this English Stack Exchange answer, which references the Oxford English Dictionary and a brief mention in Lore and Language of School Children, but nothing more substantive. —
me_
and 14:41, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
See alsoWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dibs (2nd nomination), where a similar article has recently been deleted on
WP:NOTDICT grounds (and fixing up links to that deleted article is how I found this one). I think that discussion had more claim to NOTDICT than this one, but that still doesn't solve the lack of reliable sources or other indication of notability. —
me_
and 14:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Searched for the term and found next to nothing. Does it only exist in novelty dictionaries? --
Mr. Magoo and McBarker (
talk) 14:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 02:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - No signs of a better applicably notable article yet.
SwisterTwistertalk 00:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.