- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 19:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Quex
- Quex ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article reads like an advertisement, has no secondary sources to establish notability (despite having existed since 2008 and was created by a WP:SPA. The only secondary sources that I can find are this preprint and passing mention in this article. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and I couldn't find anything myself. Doesn't appear to be notable. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Not yet notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up anything to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 19:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Quex
- Quex ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article reads like an advertisement, has no secondary sources to establish notability (despite having existed since 2008 and was created by a WP:SPA. The only secondary sources that I can find are this preprint and passing mention in this article. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 13:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and I couldn't find anything myself. Doesn't appear to be notable. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 16:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Not yet notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and above editors. Searches did not turn up anything to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.