The result was keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. Company does not seem to be notable, and while the article does contain sources, they are all press releases or dead links ( WP:GNG). The article was created by what appears to be a Single Purpose Account created to promote the company. The user has since become inactive. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû ( blah?) 22:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I vote to keep. I have no finantial ties to the company, but I do do medication error research. This is certianly a significant company for people in my line of work. PCAndrew ( talk) 16:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Beeblebrox ( talk) 05:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORP. Company does not seem to be notable, and while the article does contain sources, they are all press releases or dead links ( WP:GNG). The article was created by what appears to be a Single Purpose Account created to promote the company. The user has since become inactive. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû ( blah?) 22:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply
I vote to keep. I have no finantial ties to the company, but I do do medication error research. This is certianly a significant company for people in my line of work. PCAndrew ( talk) 16:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC) reply