The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Fram (
talk) 11:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete, as I was just getting around to nominating this one per the
WP:NOTE,
WP:RS, and
WP:COI concerns.
S.DeanJameson 21:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak delete Article reads like spam.
Artene50 (
talk) 07:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Fram (
talk) 11:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete, as I was just getting around to nominating this one per the
WP:NOTE,
WP:RS, and
WP:COI concerns.
S.DeanJameson 21:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak delete Article reads like spam.
Artene50 (
talk) 07:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.