The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge the codenames and vehicle names only to
Action Force, then scrap the rest. No need for a redirect. Any user familiar enough with the topic to look for "Q Force" will be able to find "Action Force" without help.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
13:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources aplently. Merging the subarticles will make the Action Force article absurdly large. It seems quite reasonable to split it into subarticles in this way.
Hawkeye7(discuss)02:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Please link to a few of these sources that you have found. The article currently contains three dead links as its entire list of references. I was unable to find any secondary
WP:RS. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
03:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
First source: "no results found in this book for q force". Second source: "no results found in this book for q force". No text search available for the third source. Again, if there are sources aplenty, please link to a verifiable one. I'm happy to have the article kept if it meets
WP:GNG. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
05:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge the codenames and vehicle names only to
Action Force, then scrap the rest. No need for a redirect. Any user familiar enough with the topic to look for "Q Force" will be able to find "Action Force" without help.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
13:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources aplently. Merging the subarticles will make the Action Force article absurdly large. It seems quite reasonable to split it into subarticles in this way.
Hawkeye7(discuss)02:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Please link to a few of these sources that you have found. The article currently contains three dead links as its entire list of references. I was unable to find any secondary
WP:RS. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
03:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
First source: "no results found in this book for q force". Second source: "no results found in this book for q force". No text search available for the third source. Again, if there are sources aplenty, please link to a verifiable one. I'm happy to have the article kept if it meets
WP:GNG. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
05:04, 19 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.