The result was delete. Those requesting the inclusion of this article have failed to produce evidence of notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
An application that fails to meet the GNG, shows very little notability. Alex discussion ★ 21:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please let me know how I can improve the article. I am still in process of adding content to it. Some suggestion would be really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavkaushal123 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I have updated the article with references. Is the article now in a good enough shape? If now, how can I still improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavkaushal123 ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
'Delete. Not a notable topic (see WP:GNG for general notability guidelines). No significant coverage in reliable sources that I could find. There's a book on QCubed but it's self-published. QCubed is mentioned incidentally in
Vaibhavkaushal123, it is a good effort, but there is nothing you can do; the topic simply doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirement (read WP:GNG). Scholarly journals or other reliable sources (e.g. industry magazines, books, conference proceedings) need to cover the topic, and they don't. Your article is informative and I hope you aren't discouraged from contributing to other Wikipedia articles. –– Agyle ( talk) 18:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Those requesting the inclusion of this article have failed to produce evidence of notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
An application that fails to meet the GNG, shows very little notability. Alex discussion ★ 21:48, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Please let me know how I can improve the article. I am still in process of adding content to it. Some suggestion would be really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavkaushal123 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I have updated the article with references. Is the article now in a good enough shape? If now, how can I still improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaibhavkaushal123 ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
'Delete. Not a notable topic (see WP:GNG for general notability guidelines). No significant coverage in reliable sources that I could find. There's a book on QCubed but it's self-published. QCubed is mentioned incidentally in
Vaibhavkaushal123, it is a good effort, but there is nothing you can do; the topic simply doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability requirement (read WP:GNG). Scholarly journals or other reliable sources (e.g. industry magazines, books, conference proceedings) need to cover the topic, and they don't. Your article is informative and I hope you aren't discouraged from contributing to other Wikipedia articles. –– Agyle ( talk) 18:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)