- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Pygott & Crone
- Pygott & Crone ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Death notices of a founder, a passing mention as being the estate agents for the sale of an old mental hospital , sponsorship of the local cricket team and mentions in the niche press for an award by other estate agents simply does not add up to notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Velella Velella Talk 13:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (tell) 17:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) 17:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Marginal, perhaps, but I think the subject meets notability per CORPDEPTH because there is sufficient coverage by at least regional media. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 06:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. As per Shhhnotsoloud and also coverage in national newspapers Bigmike ( talk) 08:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 08:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 08:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- wholly unremarkable, while the article contains sections such as "Services" and "Awards". Typical corp spam; this content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable for stand alone article and promotion piece. Kierzek ( talk) 15:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) 00:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) 00:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from the properties whose sale is intermediated by a firm. Local coverage of the firm is inevitable and falls short of WP:ORGCRITE. Nor do I think the industry awards are sufficient to demonstrate encyclopaedic notability. A firm going about its business, but fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 07:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- 'Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing ++ 17:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Pygott & Crone
- Pygott & Crone ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Death notices of a founder, a passing mention as being the estate agents for the sale of an old mental hospital , sponsorship of the local cricket team and mentions in the niche press for an award by other estate agents simply does not add up to notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Velella Velella Talk 13:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (tell) 17:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (notify) 17:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Marginal, perhaps, but I think the subject meets notability per CORPDEPTH because there is sufficient coverage by at least regional media. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 06:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. As per Shhhnotsoloud and also coverage in national newspapers Bigmike ( talk) 08:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 08:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 08:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- wholly unremarkable, while the article contains sections such as "Services" and "Awards". Typical corp spam; this content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable for stand alone article and promotion piece. Kierzek ( talk) 15:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) 00:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947( c) 00:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from the properties whose sale is intermediated by a firm. Local coverage of the firm is inevitable and falls short of WP:ORGCRITE. Nor do I think the industry awards are sufficient to demonstrate encyclopaedic notability. A firm going about its business, but fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD ( talk) 07:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- 'Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing ++ 17:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.