The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit23:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Existing references are primary. It exists, but no claims in the article that meet
WP:GNG nor did my search find references to support notability.
Jeepday (
talk)
16:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - it is a notable institute, popular with students and I can find google book refs and many English News articles also on searching on this institute, clearly passes
WP:GNG -
Jethwarp (
talk)
01:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Sure, there's a few articles out there about extremely trivial topics that mention the place in passing. There's nothing from what I can tell that addresses it directly and in-depth or isn't about other things that are only slightly related though. So, I'm not seeing the necessary sourcing needed to keep the article. Notability isn't just the number of Google News hits. I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if someone can provide
WP:THREE good sources though. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
06:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit23:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Existing references are primary. It exists, but no claims in the article that meet
WP:GNG nor did my search find references to support notability.
Jeepday (
talk)
16:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep - it is a notable institute, popular with students and I can find google book refs and many English News articles also on searching on this institute, clearly passes
WP:GNG -
Jethwarp (
talk)
01:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Sure, there's a few articles out there about extremely trivial topics that mention the place in passing. There's nothing from what I can tell that addresses it directly and in-depth or isn't about other things that are only slightly related though. So, I'm not seeing the necessary sourcing needed to keep the article. Notability isn't just the number of Google News hits. I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if someone can provide
WP:THREE good sources though. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
06:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.