The result was delete. MBisanz talk 08:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability never established in first debate. JNW ( talk) 18:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Then by all means close this and allow for discussion re:merge. The best defense proposed in original debate was that "the article is of marginal interest"; at no time was significance established...what may be considered an appropriate length of time before re-nominating? JNW ( talk) 19:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |year=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help). IMO the article is of marginal interest. But none of these issues provide sufficient reason for deletion. I would give the article the benefit of doubt and vote keep, at least for the moment. This is all speculation and guess work, which is not a proper foundation for keeping material. The one reference does not even say "psychokinetic art": it says "kinetic art" and "Psychokinematic Objects". The net result of your keep is
WP:ILIKEIT.
Ty
01:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replyThe result was delete. MBisanz talk 08:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Notability never established in first debate. JNW ( talk) 18:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Then by all means close this and allow for discussion re:merge. The best defense proposed in original debate was that "the article is of marginal interest"; at no time was significance established...what may be considered an appropriate length of time before re-nominating? JNW ( talk) 19:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC) reply
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |year=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(
help). IMO the article is of marginal interest. But none of these issues provide sufficient reason for deletion. I would give the article the benefit of doubt and vote keep, at least for the moment. This is all speculation and guess work, which is not a proper foundation for keeping material. The one reference does not even say "psychokinetic art": it says "kinetic art" and "Psychokinematic Objects". The net result of your keep is
WP:ILIKEIT.
Ty
01:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
reply