The result of the debate was keep. WP:NOT a crystal ball, but verifiable cases of other people crystal ball-gazing (e.g. the press) is usually enough, as we can see here using primitive vote-counting techniques. fuddlemark ( fuddle me!) 12:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikiepdia is not a crystal ball. Bobby1011 05:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. WP:NOT a crystal ball, but verifiable cases of other people crystal ball-gazing (e.g. the press) is usually enough, as we can see here using primitive vote-counting techniques. fuddlemark ( fuddle me!) 12:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC) reply
Wikiepdia is not a crystal ball. Bobby1011 05:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC) reply