- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete due to lack of WP:SIGCOV about the company itself. RL0919 ( talk) 17:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Prosoft Engineering
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Prosoft Engineering ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are mainly primary or promotional, and a lot are the company's own website. My own research finds little but PR, passing mentions of products on software review websites, etc. Thre's a lack of substantial independent coverage of the organisation itself, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Hugsyrup ( talk) 10:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per NCORP. Non-notable company with no significant coverage, the only time they are covered are passing mentions when their products are reviewed, in non-notable reviews and often only one site. -- qedk ( t 桜 c) 11:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - lots of possibly notable products, but no WP:SIGCOV found in my WP:BEFORE. FOARP ( talk) 12:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete due to lack of WP:SIGCOV about the company itself. RL0919 ( talk) 17:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Prosoft Engineering
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Prosoft Engineering ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are mainly primary or promotional, and a lot are the company's own website. My own research finds little but PR, passing mentions of products on software review websites, etc. Thre's a lack of substantial independent coverage of the organisation itself, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Hugsyrup ( talk) 10:51, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per NCORP. Non-notable company with no significant coverage, the only time they are covered are passing mentions when their products are reviewed, in non-notable reviews and often only one site. -- qedk ( t 桜 c) 11:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - lots of possibly notable products, but no WP:SIGCOV found in my WP:BEFORE. FOARP ( talk) 12:43, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.