The result was delete. WP:SNOW - no point in keeping this hanging around any longer nancy 10:26, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply
I am unable to find any independent verifying information about this project. Nothing at all on Google, and the official page is a do-it-yourself webs.com site. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 15:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC) reply
From the Editor of this article:
Did you not read it more? There is an official released document that is in MLA-styled citation! You really expect something to be done so quickly? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.87.114.42 (
talk)
01:26, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
Another note from the Editor: So you'd rather be out of date? Schools would stop using Wikipedia (They already have stopped because of outdated sources) And rather more halt any possible growth of current knowledge? For the final time... it is all under wraps... if it was meant to be completely open, then Michael Adams himself would be editing this, not me! But if you want to delete, then by all means go ahead. Wordpress will gladly take all this and not care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.87.114.42 ( talk) 02:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Another note from the editor: Then what is your definition of verifiability? It comes from a primary source! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.87.114.42 ( talk) 16:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Xero: Definition is noted, but by your definition, my article is original and therefore, is verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProjectNeo ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOW - no point in keeping this hanging around any longer nancy 10:26, 20 November 2011 (UTC) reply
I am unable to find any independent verifying information about this project. Nothing at all on Google, and the official page is a do-it-yourself webs.com site. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 15:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC) reply
From the Editor of this article:
Did you not read it more? There is an official released document that is in MLA-styled citation! You really expect something to be done so quickly? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.87.114.42 (
talk)
01:26, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
reply
Another note from the Editor: So you'd rather be out of date? Schools would stop using Wikipedia (They already have stopped because of outdated sources) And rather more halt any possible growth of current knowledge? For the final time... it is all under wraps... if it was meant to be completely open, then Michael Adams himself would be editing this, not me! But if you want to delete, then by all means go ahead. Wordpress will gladly take all this and not care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.87.114.42 ( talk) 02:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Another note from the editor: Then what is your definition of verifiability? It comes from a primary source! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.87.114.42 ( talk) 16:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
Xero: Definition is noted, but by your definition, my article is original and therefore, is verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProjectNeo ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply