- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) st170e talk 23:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Progressive Adventism
- Progressive Adventism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe the progressive adventism article is notoriously inaccurate as there is no objective standard for what a progressive adventist or a conservative adventist is Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 02:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The article can probably use some good working on, but there are quite a few sources there that seem to disagree with the nominator's rationale. TimothyJosephWood 20:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of -related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- keep the distinction between the groups is quite apparent but it does need improvement. -- MindyWaters ( talk) 21:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - While a clunky article, I believe this topic meets GNG based on sources showing in the footnotes. N.B. Nominator: many sociological and political concepts are not precisely defined or are defined differently in different sources. This does not invalidate the inclusion-worthiness of the topic, it only complicates the writing of the article. Take, for example, conservative or liberal. Carrite ( talk) 15:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) st170e talk 23:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Progressive Adventism
- Progressive Adventism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe the progressive adventism article is notoriously inaccurate as there is no objective standard for what a progressive adventist or a conservative adventist is Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 02:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The article can probably use some good working on, but there are quite a few sources there that seem to disagree with the nominator's rationale. TimothyJosephWood 20:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of -related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- keep the distinction between the groups is quite apparent but it does need improvement. -- MindyWaters ( talk) 21:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - While a clunky article, I believe this topic meets GNG based on sources showing in the footnotes. N.B. Nominator: many sociological and political concepts are not precisely defined or are defined differently in different sources. This does not invalidate the inclusion-worthiness of the topic, it only complicates the writing of the article. Take, for example, conservative or liberal. Carrite ( talk) 15:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.