- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
ProSama 2010
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ProSama 2010 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. PepperBeast (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lithuania. PepperBeast (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage in any reliable sources found. Not notable. 0x Deadbeef→∞ ( talk to me) 12:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete If the subject is notable, it should turn up at least some articles about it when I use a search engine on it. All I saw was download pages and generic company lists. There have been no added citation since 2012.
- Roostery123 ( talk) 13:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. It is lacking in even the most basic trivial mentions and routine blog reviews that fail to show notability for other articles, let alone anything approaching significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The software was released in 2010, and that is not so long ago that sources would go dark across the board like that if there was something out there. GBooks, GScholar, JSTOR, TWL, Newspapers.com, archive.org, all bone dry. - Aoidh ( talk) 02:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
ProSama 2010
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ProSama 2010 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. PepperBeast (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lithuania. PepperBeast (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage in any reliable sources found. Not notable. 0x Deadbeef→∞ ( talk to me) 12:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete If the subject is notable, it should turn up at least some articles about it when I use a search engine on it. All I saw was download pages and generic company lists. There have been no added citation since 2012.
- Roostery123 ( talk) 13:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. It is lacking in even the most basic trivial mentions and routine blog reviews that fail to show notability for other articles, let alone anything approaching significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The software was released in 2010, and that is not so long ago that sources would go dark across the board like that if there was something out there. GBooks, GScholar, JSTOR, TWL, Newspapers.com, archive.org, all bone dry. - Aoidh ( talk) 02:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.