- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
What I see in this article are lots of unsourced and potentially libelous claims about a living person. What I do not see is any indication of notability. She is a daughter of some people, who were children of some other people, and she married a guy, with whom she had children, who had children of their own, and whose children are now reproducing as well. All very mundane. The only sources cited here are genealogy websites (of very questionable reliability). Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. It is not the place to compile this kind of information. Furthermore, there is no indication that she calls herself a princess or that she pretends to any pseudo-royal status. This article needs to go. Surtsicna ( talk) 18:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no claim to notability made, we are not a genealogy database. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 01:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The only reliable sources I could find were a German newspaper report of her wedding and a later mention of her attendance at a festival in Wiesbaden, but frankly almost anyone could be mentioned twice in a local newspaper. This is insufficient to meet our notability requirements. She doesn't appear to be a public figure. DrKay ( talk) 10:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a geneological database, least of all to keep tabs on members of royal houses that have been out of power for a century. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the reasons given by the editors above. Smeat75 ( talk) 19:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Princess Theresa of Bavaria (b. 1931) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
What I see in this article are lots of unsourced and potentially libelous claims about a living person. What I do not see is any indication of notability. She is a daughter of some people, who were children of some other people, and she married a guy, with whom she had children, who had children of their own, and whose children are now reproducing as well. All very mundane. The only sources cited here are genealogy websites (of very questionable reliability). Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. It is not the place to compile this kind of information. Furthermore, there is no indication that she calls herself a princess or that she pretends to any pseudo-royal status. This article needs to go. Surtsicna ( talk) 18:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 16:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no claim to notability made, we are not a genealogy database. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 01:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The only reliable sources I could find were a German newspaper report of her wedding and a later mention of her attendance at a festival in Wiesbaden, but frankly almost anyone could be mentioned twice in a local newspaper. This is insufficient to meet our notability requirements. She doesn't appear to be a public figure. DrKay ( talk) 10:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a geneological database, least of all to keep tabs on members of royal houses that have been out of power for a century. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the reasons given by the editors above. Smeat75 ( talk) 19:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.