The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This looks like a possibly notable bicycle manufacturer, but there are no sources and I can't find any concrete ones to expand the article with, aside from a few in Swiss German. However, this is probably because the name makes searching impossible - can anyone else help? Some possible sources -
[1],
[2],
[3]Ritchie333(talk)(cont)10:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Since I'm the one who (apparently erroneously) proposed the earlier speedy, I'll inevitably be voting to delete. While I appreciate that it's difficult to find sources due to the generic brand name, it shouldn't be impossible if there are genuinely RS mentions about (and I don't think product catalogues count). As it stands, IMO this fails
WP:GNG /
WP:COMPANY. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
08:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This looks like a possibly notable bicycle manufacturer, but there are no sources and I can't find any concrete ones to expand the article with, aside from a few in Swiss German. However, this is probably because the name makes searching impossible - can anyone else help? Some possible sources -
[1],
[2],
[3]Ritchie333(talk)(cont)10:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Since I'm the one who (apparently erroneously) proposed the earlier speedy, I'll inevitably be voting to delete. While I appreciate that it's difficult to find sources due to the generic brand name, it shouldn't be impossible if there are genuinely RS mentions about (and I don't think product catalogues count). As it stands, IMO this fails
WP:GNG /
WP:COMPANY. --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
08:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.