The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: He had played a quite significant role on mentioned films in his biography and all the films which he had played is notable and highly recognised films- In my point of view.
Pakhaetaey (
talk)
07:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. I'm not quite seeing notability here, at least not yet. Pandey's appearances have all been in secondary/supporting roles, so invoking
WP:NACTOR's "significant roles in multiple notable films" criterion would probably be a stretch. I don't think the awards mentioned move the needle too much either. Of the sources cited, the only one that discusses Pandey in depth (not just a passing mention) is
this one. While it seems to be from a reliable outlet, the story seems to be mostly sourced to an interview with Pandey himself, raising independence questions. Moreover, a single source is not enough to meet the
GNG, and my attempts to search for coverage in English and Nepali have come up empty-handed. While Pandey may become notable in the future, I don't think he's crossed that threshold yet, although I'm glad to reconsider if there are additional Nepali-language sources that I've missed.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I think redirect to
this would be a better option than delete. If he is unable to pass these criteria. Is award is enough to pass the notability criteria except of GNG.
Fade258 (
talk)
05:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: He had played a quite significant role on mentioned films in his biography and all the films which he had played is notable and highly recognised films- In my point of view.
Pakhaetaey (
talk)
07:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. I'm not quite seeing notability here, at least not yet. Pandey's appearances have all been in secondary/supporting roles, so invoking
WP:NACTOR's "significant roles in multiple notable films" criterion would probably be a stretch. I don't think the awards mentioned move the needle too much either. Of the sources cited, the only one that discusses Pandey in depth (not just a passing mention) is
this one. While it seems to be from a reliable outlet, the story seems to be mostly sourced to an interview with Pandey himself, raising independence questions. Moreover, a single source is not enough to meet the
GNG, and my attempts to search for coverage in English and Nepali have come up empty-handed. While Pandey may become notable in the future, I don't think he's crossed that threshold yet, although I'm glad to reconsider if there are additional Nepali-language sources that I've missed.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I think redirect to
this would be a better option than delete. If he is unable to pass these criteria. Is award is enough to pass the notability criteria except of GNG.
Fade258 (
talk)
05:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.