- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Prayer for the Current Financial Situation
- Prayer for the Current Financial Situation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is not notable. It's about a prayer that was on a website some years back. No pages link to it. The only claim to fame is that it pushed up traffic on the website for a while. It doesn't warrant a page of its own and the has probably passed when it could be merged into another page. I'm not convinced it can be improved. Rbreen ( talk) 21:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I have refreshed the dead citation from an independent news source, but agree that it does not reach the required level of notability. – Fayenatic L ondon 18:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -- Those who believe in reading prayers, rather than saying them from the heart are always writing new prayers for others to read. This one sounds as if of very temporary notability, i.e. NN. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Prayer for the Current Financial Situation
- Prayer for the Current Financial Situation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is not notable. It's about a prayer that was on a website some years back. No pages link to it. The only claim to fame is that it pushed up traffic on the website for a while. It doesn't warrant a page of its own and the has probably passed when it could be merged into another page. I'm not convinced it can be improved. Rbreen ( talk) 21:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:37, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I have refreshed the dead citation from an independent news source, but agree that it does not reach the required level of notability. – Fayenatic L ondon 18:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -- Those who believe in reading prayers, rather than saying them from the heart are always writing new prayers for others to read. This one sounds as if of very temporary notability, i.e. NN. Peterkingiron ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.