- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. After three relists it's time to move on. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Powerpet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability issue. Normal residential area in a city. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - This does appear to be an officially distinct neighborhood [1] with its own train station - Powerpet railway station - and the businesses and residences official addresses are listed as Powerpet.-- Oakshade ( talk) 04:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- @
Oakshade: You are thinking the the way around. The train station was on he track in 1896. The locality developed around it. Having a train station is not a notable feat. If it is a locality, obviously people are going to use the address. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- The station was built to serve the community the railroad deemed significant enough to build a station for. Stations aren't built to serve nobody. That the community is bigger now doesn't make it not notable. Almost every existing community is bigger than it was 100 years ago. --
Oakshade (
talk)
00:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Oakshade: In India, it is completely different. If there is no station/stop for a lot of kilometres between two stations, a new station is created in the middle of nowhere. Thats how Manwath Road, Latur Road junction railway station came into existence. Almost half of the stations with the suffix Road were created similar to this. They are named after a nearby town/city that is not on the track, Remaining half were created to actually serve the nearby area. This town has a railway station but it is not even mentioned anywhere. But cuz of the newly established station, the town is growing. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The station was built to serve the community the railroad deemed significant enough to build a station for. Stations aren't built to serve nobody. That the community is bigger now doesn't make it not notable. Almost every existing community is bigger than it was 100 years ago. --
Oakshade (
talk)
00:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @
Oakshade: You are thinking the the way around. The train station was on he track in 1896. The locality developed around it. Having a train station is not a notable feat. If it is a locality, obviously people are going to use the address. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Eluru where it is mentioned as a commercial center of the city. Without sufficient independent notability, neighborhoods are covered in the larger area. MB 17:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. After three relists it's time to move on. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Powerpet ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability issue. Normal residential area in a city. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - This does appear to be an officially distinct neighborhood [1] with its own train station - Powerpet railway station - and the businesses and residences official addresses are listed as Powerpet.-- Oakshade ( talk) 04:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- @
Oakshade: You are thinking the the way around. The train station was on he track in 1896. The locality developed around it. Having a train station is not a notable feat. If it is a locality, obviously people are going to use the address. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- The station was built to serve the community the railroad deemed significant enough to build a station for. Stations aren't built to serve nobody. That the community is bigger now doesn't make it not notable. Almost every existing community is bigger than it was 100 years ago. --
Oakshade (
talk)
00:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Oakshade: In India, it is completely different. If there is no station/stop for a lot of kilometres between two stations, a new station is created in the middle of nowhere. Thats how Manwath Road, Latur Road junction railway station came into existence. Almost half of the stations with the suffix Road were created similar to this. They are named after a nearby town/city that is not on the track, Remaining half were created to actually serve the nearby area. This town has a railway station but it is not even mentioned anywhere. But cuz of the newly established station, the town is growing. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The station was built to serve the community the railroad deemed significant enough to build a station for. Stations aren't built to serve nobody. That the community is bigger now doesn't make it not notable. Almost every existing community is bigger than it was 100 years ago. --
Oakshade (
talk)
00:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @
Oakshade: You are thinking the the way around. The train station was on he track in 1896. The locality developed around it. Having a train station is not a notable feat. If it is a locality, obviously people are going to use the address. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Eluru where it is mentioned as a commercial center of the city. Without sufficient independent notability, neighborhoods are covered in the larger area. MB 17:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 14:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.