- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 11:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Post-nut clarity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Post-nut clarity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDICT -- FMSky ( talk) 07:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Think prior to this nom, it was just a stub (so, as per the linked WP:NOTDICT: "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry,"). I think this was a case of that, but in any case, I fleshed out the article to hopefully expand on it seeming like a dictionary entry. Soulbust ( talk) 11:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep pretty evident coverage of this term not just as a definition, but also as a phenomenon which has been discussed at length in plenty of reliable sources. If this is seriously in question, I'll come back and link several. BrigadierG ( talk) 12:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Huh, wasn't sure, it appears to be notable.-- Milowent • has spoken 18:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG, is substantial beyond a dictionary entry. Air on White ( talk) 00:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - [WP:SIGCOV|sufficient sources]] beyond a dicdef. Also, it is similar to, yet different from Anagnorisis. Bearian ( talk) 15:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a reasonable article to have. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 21:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 11:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Post-nut clarity
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Post-nut clarity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDICT -- FMSky ( talk) 07:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Think prior to this nom, it was just a stub (so, as per the linked WP:NOTDICT: "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry,"). I think this was a case of that, but in any case, I fleshed out the article to hopefully expand on it seeming like a dictionary entry. Soulbust ( talk) 11:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep pretty evident coverage of this term not just as a definition, but also as a phenomenon which has been discussed at length in plenty of reliable sources. If this is seriously in question, I'll come back and link several. BrigadierG ( talk) 12:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Huh, wasn't sure, it appears to be notable.-- Milowent • has spoken 18:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG, is substantial beyond a dictionary entry. Air on White ( talk) 00:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - [WP:SIGCOV|sufficient sources]] beyond a dicdef. Also, it is similar to, yet different from Anagnorisis. Bearian ( talk) 15:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a reasonable article to have. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 21:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.