- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Pontevedra Viva
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pontevedra Viva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, and Spain. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi MarioGom. As it is not easy to find other secondary or tertiary sources for a regional newspaper apart from the two already cited in the references, couldn't the article be converted into a stub so that it is not deleted as happens in the Wikipedia articles of other Galician newspapers such as El Diario de Ferrol /info/en/?search=El_Diario_de_Ferrol, Atlántico Diario /info/en/?search=Atl%C3%A1ntico_Diario or Galicia Hoxe /info/en/?search=Galicia_Hoxe that hardly or not cite sources?
- Best regards, MJSB73MP ( talk) 10:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Seems like a reasonable amount of coverage for a newspaper with 200k readers. Given newspapers don't commonly write long and detailed articles about other newspapers, I'm not sure what else anyone could expect to see. I can't really see a problem with this (unless the information is completely fake) so I'd say keep as it is. JMWt ( talk) 12:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep - I think this barely crosses the threshhold. The tipping point from me was the coverage in New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies: Volume 2. Onel5969 TT me 12:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Coverage just scrapes in to meet notability thresholds. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Pontevedra Viva
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pontevedra Viva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Companies, and Spain. MarioGom ( talk) 10:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi MarioGom. As it is not easy to find other secondary or tertiary sources for a regional newspaper apart from the two already cited in the references, couldn't the article be converted into a stub so that it is not deleted as happens in the Wikipedia articles of other Galician newspapers such as El Diario de Ferrol /info/en/?search=El_Diario_de_Ferrol, Atlántico Diario /info/en/?search=Atl%C3%A1ntico_Diario or Galicia Hoxe /info/en/?search=Galicia_Hoxe that hardly or not cite sources?
- Best regards, MJSB73MP ( talk) 10:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Seems like a reasonable amount of coverage for a newspaper with 200k readers. Given newspapers don't commonly write long and detailed articles about other newspapers, I'm not sure what else anyone could expect to see. I can't really see a problem with this (unless the information is completely fake) so I'd say keep as it is. JMWt ( talk) 12:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep - I think this barely crosses the threshhold. The tipping point from me was the coverage in New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies: Volume 2. Onel5969 TT me 12:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Coverage just scrapes in to meet notability thresholds. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.