- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Polylog (journal)
- Polylog (journal) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell (mostly based on [1] and the journal's website), this journal is indexed in no significant databases and thus fails WP:NJOURNAL. I don't speak German though, and I'm not super familiar with philosophy journals and their indexing services though. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Even when searching through German language news sources, books, and the like, the journal doesn't seem notable. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 01:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree and I simply see no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 11:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Polylog (journal)
- Polylog (journal) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell (mostly based on [1] and the journal's website), this journal is indexed in no significant databases and thus fails WP:NJOURNAL. I don't speak German though, and I'm not super familiar with philosophy journals and their indexing services though. Headbomb { talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:59, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Toffanin ( talk) 19:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Even when searching through German language news sources, books, and the like, the journal doesn't seem notable. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 01:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 14:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree and I simply see no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.