From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 13:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Polog front

Polog front (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page in question has already been deleted once as redundant and duplicating other articles. Now it is created again under the pretext that it has a different content. This, in my opinion, is frivolous. Jingiby ( talk) 12:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete - It's the same case as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karadak front. With slight changes, it's still not a different article. On top of that, there are no reliable sources that use the term "Polog front". StephenMacky1 ( talk) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 13:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Polog front

Polog front (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page in question has already been deleted once as redundant and duplicating other articles. Now it is created again under the pretext that it has a different content. This, in my opinion, is frivolous. Jingiby ( talk) 12:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete - It's the same case as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karadak front. With slight changes, it's still not a different article. On top of that, there are no reliable sources that use the term "Polog front". StephenMacky1 ( talk) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook