- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Playtech. ansh 666 02:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Playtech BGT Sports
- Playtech BGT Sports ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nothing out there that meets corpdepth, all references are from unreliable sources or regurgitated press releases- additionally some references are about the parent company Playtech and I see nothing that couldn't be put in that article instead. Notability is not transferred. Additionally almost certainly created by UPE editor in violation of our TOS. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 15:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- not independently notable of the parent company. The redirect would be pointless since anyone typing in Playtech would get to the parent company; there's no need to preserve article history since is spam built on WP:SPIP sources. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge Nothing passes NCORP imo. Reads like a listing more than an informative article. The only credibility is that the parent company has sufficient notability to have coverage across wide topics. -- QEDK ( 桜 ❄ 伴) 08:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and Merge. Agree with K.e.coffman above. Any relevant info can be merged into the parent company article. HighKing ++ 17:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge I found very little in the way of sources to satisfy GNG. It's a significant division of the parent company though, so it should probably have about a paragraph in Playtech#Operations. Toohool ( talk) 19:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Playtech. ansh 666 02:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Playtech BGT Sports
- Playtech BGT Sports ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nothing out there that meets corpdepth, all references are from unreliable sources or regurgitated press releases- additionally some references are about the parent company Playtech and I see nothing that couldn't be put in that article instead. Notability is not transferred. Additionally almost certainly created by UPE editor in violation of our TOS. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 15:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss fortune 15:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- not independently notable of the parent company. The redirect would be pointless since anyone typing in Playtech would get to the parent company; there's no need to preserve article history since is spam built on WP:SPIP sources. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge Nothing passes NCORP imo. Reads like a listing more than an informative article. The only credibility is that the parent company has sufficient notability to have coverage across wide topics. -- QEDK ( 桜 ❄ 伴) 08:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and Merge. Agree with K.e.coffman above. Any relevant info can be merged into the parent company article. HighKing ++ 17:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge I found very little in the way of sources to satisfy GNG. It's a significant division of the parent company though, so it should probably have about a paragraph in Playtech#Operations. Toohool ( talk) 19:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.