- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ceuta. Daniel ( talk) 00:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Playa San Amaro
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Playa San Amaro ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small generic beach with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. One source is just a label on a map, not significant coverage. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:BEFORE. I see a lot of sources in both English and Spanish. It appears to be a beach with some hotels. Perhaps this can be saved? Bearian ( talk) 16:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect: I can't find anything other than mentions in tourism sites, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Per GEOLAND, "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography." I don't see any reason not to redirect it to Ceuta, but I don't think there is anything to merge. // Timothy :: talk 08:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ceuta. Daniel ( talk) 00:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Playa San Amaro
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Playa San Amaro ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small generic beach with no explanation of notability, fails WP:GEOLAND. One source is just a label on a map, not significant coverage. Prod removed without explanation as usual. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Reywas92 Talk 19:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:BEFORE. I see a lot of sources in both English and Spanish. It appears to be a beach with some hotels. Perhaps this can be saved? Bearian ( talk) 16:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect: I can't find anything other than mentions in tourism sites, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Per GEOLAND, "Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc. The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography." I don't see any reason not to redirect it to Ceuta, but I don't think there is anything to merge. // Timothy :: talk 08:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.