The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Can't find any sources about this company. It may the case that Greek sources exist, in which case I will be happy to retract this nomination.
Sam Walton (
talk)
09:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Regardless of whether the org is notable (or if sources exist in Greek), the current article is 100% original research. Deleting the unsourced content constitutes deleting the article.
CorporateM (
Talk)
07:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - The Greek article basically looks the same and, existing since September 2009, there was enough time for improvement to be made. But it seems there is no possible improvement as my searches found nothing particularly good aside from
this,
this and
this.
SwisterTwistertalk05:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Can't find any sources about this company. It may the case that Greek sources exist, in which case I will be happy to retract this nomination.
Sam Walton (
talk)
09:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Regardless of whether the org is notable (or if sources exist in Greek), the current article is 100% original research. Deleting the unsourced content constitutes deleting the article.
CorporateM (
Talk)
07:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - The Greek article basically looks the same and, existing since September 2009, there was enough time for improvement to be made. But it seems there is no possible improvement as my searches found nothing particularly good aside from
this,
this and
this.
SwisterTwistertalk05:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.