The result was Keep and rename to Pixel artist, following the rewrite. Also, Esn has made some good observations which should be seriously considered. Ty 00:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, looks made-up and is salted with buzz-word crap. Rob Banzai ( talk) 22:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Andy knows how to use BIG words oh boy! "salted with buzz-word crap" actually if you knew how wrong your were you would dirty yourself with your own "crap" I think you should be put up for a speedy deletion and oh yea... It is clear that you are an elitist pig too and I can smell your "crap" all the way over here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is no need to have an engaging conversation with you boys because you have clearly decided (without any formal education on this terminology) that this not worthy of your ignorant position. "nonsense or at best a neologism"
WOW... how wrong you are. Sorry boys you just lack the understanding of this important artistic definition. This is common terminology in the digital arts - especially amoug the well-season artist that have been working in the digital arts for over two decades. Sorry boys you are out of you league. I know this may be a tough pill to shallow but it is true. The two of you have the intellect of a neutron.
Keep the purpose of this discussion is to form a consensus based on a dialogue regarding the notability of this article for inclusion or exclusion from Wikipedia, the personal attacks in this discussion are patently irrelevant including the inciteful rationale for deletion. As for pixology a google scholar search seems to indicate that the subject is at the very least nominally notable however, it seems to be more about photographic development and a software of that name than the current article which indicates somewhat of an overlap with graphic design. MY♥INchile 23:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
So I guess that "salted with buzz-word crap" is not a personal attack... you boys need to take a good look in the mirror —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Well Reyk-yoyo maybe you are all a bunch of intellectual bozos. You should try to help a newbie rather than setting up so many rules and roadblocks for submission. I am a Digital Artist and one of the very first Users of the technology(over 25 years ago). I have taught at several major Universities including the University of Michan School of Art and Design / and the UofM Film school - The college for creative studies - Cranbrook - The University of Tampa - The International Academy of Design and Technology. I have also worked in some of the Top industrial Design Offices including The General Motoers Design Center and The Chrysler Design Office.
As far as I can tell you are all a bunch of wanna be intellectual snobs and you would rather slice and dice an new guy than help or embrace new ideas that are out of your scope. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 00:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Reyk - Thank you for your kind and thoughtful reply. Apparently there are folks associated with wiki who would rather dismiss a new emerging idea rather than trying to understand it. Yes my use of language was abrupt but only after I was characterized as "crap" and "a neologism"... Looser!
Maybe I jumped into the pool too quickly - I would appreciate some help. If you guys care to pull the "Pixologist" for now... then go for it - but I will tell you there are highly (6 figure salaries) professionals within the industry were I worked for 15 years that use this language everyday. Once again I am sorry if my words are "crap"and "a neologism" but really some people need to get off there intellectual high horse and eat a humble pie.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 02:24, 1 August 2008
The result was Keep and rename to Pixel artist, following the rewrite. Also, Esn has made some good observations which should be seriously considered. Ty 00:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, looks made-up and is salted with buzz-word crap. Rob Banzai ( talk) 22:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Andy knows how to use BIG words oh boy! "salted with buzz-word crap" actually if you knew how wrong your were you would dirty yourself with your own "crap" I think you should be put up for a speedy deletion and oh yea... It is clear that you are an elitist pig too and I can smell your "crap" all the way over here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is no need to have an engaging conversation with you boys because you have clearly decided (without any formal education on this terminology) that this not worthy of your ignorant position. "nonsense or at best a neologism"
WOW... how wrong you are. Sorry boys you just lack the understanding of this important artistic definition. This is common terminology in the digital arts - especially amoug the well-season artist that have been working in the digital arts for over two decades. Sorry boys you are out of you league. I know this may be a tough pill to shallow but it is true. The two of you have the intellect of a neutron.
Keep the purpose of this discussion is to form a consensus based on a dialogue regarding the notability of this article for inclusion or exclusion from Wikipedia, the personal attacks in this discussion are patently irrelevant including the inciteful rationale for deletion. As for pixology a google scholar search seems to indicate that the subject is at the very least nominally notable however, it seems to be more about photographic development and a software of that name than the current article which indicates somewhat of an overlap with graphic design. MY♥INchile 23:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
So I guess that "salted with buzz-word crap" is not a personal attack... you boys need to take a good look in the mirror —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Well Reyk-yoyo maybe you are all a bunch of intellectual bozos. You should try to help a newbie rather than setting up so many rules and roadblocks for submission. I am a Digital Artist and one of the very first Users of the technology(over 25 years ago). I have taught at several major Universities including the University of Michan School of Art and Design / and the UofM Film school - The college for creative studies - Cranbrook - The University of Tampa - The International Academy of Design and Technology. I have also worked in some of the Top industrial Design Offices including The General Motoers Design Center and The Chrysler Design Office.
As far as I can tell you are all a bunch of wanna be intellectual snobs and you would rather slice and dice an new guy than help or embrace new ideas that are out of your scope. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 00:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Reyk - Thank you for your kind and thoughtful reply. Apparently there are folks associated with wiki who would rather dismiss a new emerging idea rather than trying to understand it. Yes my use of language was abrupt but only after I was characterized as "crap" and "a neologism"... Looser!
Maybe I jumped into the pool too quickly - I would appreciate some help. If you guys care to pull the "Pixologist" for now... then go for it - but I will tell you there are highly (6 figure salaries) professionals within the industry were I worked for 15 years that use this language everyday. Once again I am sorry if my words are "crap"and "a neologism" but really some people need to get off there intellectual high horse and eat a humble pie.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Flipskarley ( talk • contribs) 02:24, 1 August 2008