 | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 September 20. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Pidge (company)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pidge (company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renominating, as the previous AfD from two weeks ago resulted in a "soft delete" following which the author requested undeletion. This is a 4 year old WP:ROTM startup with no claim of significance or noteworthiness. Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine fundraising announcements and PR. Teemu.cod ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Teemu.cod ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete They've launched nationwide growth and have raided 60 million in funding; typical PR stuff found in Gnews. Nothing for notability found otherwise. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex ( talk) 15:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 20:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 September 20. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Pidge (company)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pidge (company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renominating, as the previous AfD from two weeks ago resulted in a "soft delete" following which the author requested undeletion. This is a 4 year old WP:ROTM startup with no claim of significance or noteworthiness. Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine fundraising announcements and PR. Teemu.cod ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Teemu.cod ( talk) 14:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete They've launched nationwide growth and have raided 60 million in funding; typical PR stuff found in Gnews. Nothing for notability found otherwise. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex ( talk) 15:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 20:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.