- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pickens Pond ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nondescript body of water. WP:NOTEVERYTHING, not even geographical features. Geschichte ( talk) 07:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm finding no coverage, not even the sort of local news coverage that these geographical features often generate. Applying WP:GEOLAND, I believe that there is no "information beyond statistics and coordinates" available. In such a case, not even the sweeping geographic notability guidelines will save it. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This user created hundreds if not thousands of articles on non-notable geographic features in New York, using only the GNIS. GNIS is merely a compilation of names that have appeared on maps, not a signifier of notability, and all of these pages that lack any additional discussion fail GEOLAND-4 and should be deleted. Reywas92 Talk 19:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- delete I see no claim to notability, and most of the text appears to be WP:OR from reading maps. Mangoe ( talk) 01:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pickens Pond ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nondescript body of water. WP:NOTEVERYTHING, not even geographical features. Geschichte ( talk) 07:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm finding no coverage, not even the sort of local news coverage that these geographical features often generate. Applying WP:GEOLAND, I believe that there is no "information beyond statistics and coordinates" available. In such a case, not even the sweeping geographic notability guidelines will save it. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This user created hundreds if not thousands of articles on non-notable geographic features in New York, using only the GNIS. GNIS is merely a compilation of names that have appeared on maps, not a signifier of notability, and all of these pages that lack any additional discussion fail GEOLAND-4 and should be deleted. Reywas92 Talk 19:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- delete I see no claim to notability, and most of the text appears to be WP:OR from reading maps. Mangoe ( talk) 01:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.