From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Physiocrine

Physiocrine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PubMed search returns no results. A Google search returns pages of results related to the company atyrpharma.com. On one of their pages they state "We refer to these extracellular signaling regions of tRNA synthetases, along with splice-variants of the regions of tRNA synthetases, as Physiocrines". This term has been coined by this company and hasn't gained widespread usage. Pontificalibus ( talk) 07:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable neologism that only appears with regard to aTyr Pharma's press releases (which, by the way, have been plagiarized in creating parts of this article). Article is not describing a scientific concept, it is marketing a drug concept. Agricolae ( talk) 14:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The term does not seem to be used except as a "branding" effort by aTyr Pharma. I strongly suspect this article is the product of undisclosed paid editing. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 18:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
I got the same impression, potential COI issues. Agricolae ( talk) 15:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom - not really something that exists. bd2412 T 02:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Physiocrine

Physiocrine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A PubMed search returns no results. A Google search returns pages of results related to the company atyrpharma.com. On one of their pages they state "We refer to these extracellular signaling regions of tRNA synthetases, along with splice-variants of the regions of tRNA synthetases, as Physiocrines". This term has been coined by this company and hasn't gained widespread usage. Pontificalibus ( talk) 07:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable neologism that only appears with regard to aTyr Pharma's press releases (which, by the way, have been plagiarized in creating parts of this article). Article is not describing a scientific concept, it is marketing a drug concept. Agricolae ( talk) 14:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The term does not seem to be used except as a "branding" effort by aTyr Pharma. I strongly suspect this article is the product of undisclosed paid editing. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 18:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC) reply
I got the same impression, potential COI issues. Agricolae ( talk) 15:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom - not really something that exists. bd2412 T 02:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook